Showing posts with label R.J. Dawson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label R.J. Dawson. Show all posts

Sunday, November 27, 2016

REAL RELATIONSHIP: The Revelation (1)



This is from the blog Real Christianity:


“There is a reason people have problems in their attempt to minister together. The chief obstacle which has been in the way for the greater portion of the church age is still in the way…”

.
         I have written extensively on this subject. My book, Real Christianity, delves deeply into the issue. I have taught many Bible Studies on the topic.
         Though the following excerpt from the book is relatively brief, it presents the historical and Biblical essence of Real Relationship and helps every believer to discover how it positively affects his or her Christian experience and discipleship.
         Speaking of which, I highly recommend buying my book. It has received excellent reviews. Its pages are loaded with truth that reveals this application of the Lord’s teachings, the Divide and Conquer tactic against it, and so many other methods of the enemy that strive to limit and even stop the progress of the Lord’s real Community by eliminating real spiritual relationship, both with the Lord and with one another.
         Thank you and be blessed:
.

REAL RELATIONSHIP


         There is a reason people have problems in their attempt to minister together. The chief obstacle which has been in the way for the greater portion of the church age is still in the way. We exist in the midst of a major revelation, which Christendom has repeatedly failed to apply properly. This attests to its freshness. That it had to come by revelation shows the depths of our collective naiveté. Of course, many in the pew saw the need for it long before the pulpiteers, but were powerless, in their estimation, to do anything significant about establishing it since it seemed to be in opposition to the status quo. Indeed, the ruling clergy is threatened by it and has therefore tried to water it down or channel it in a “safe” direction. But such puny attempts by even punier autocrats will never succeed against the will of God.
         What is this major revelation? Put simply, it is real relationship. Its fundamental hindrance is the clergy-laity division which was firmly established by the fourth century A.D. Remember, the Church, or Qahal[1] which Jesus initiated was a community—the community of called-out ones. In the early days, there were no class distinctions or divisions—everyone participated in a meaningful, fulfilling way. At present, though we might try, we will never arrive at real relationship church-wide, until we do away with the clergy-laity split. [2]
         Many churches have attempted to incorporate spiritual relationship between members into their objectives, and most of them think they have succeeded. This reveals at least a small amount of religious pride which must be eliminated as well. The clergy can attach any label it desires to a thing, but labeling is often as far as it gets. Those who have made great starts in the heat of great opposition, on the other hand, should be commended for their stand and supported for stepping out. In takes more time than we think, however, before real relationship is established within a group, and those who have begun the process must press on. When we at last lay to rest the evil root which causes division in the Church, we will have:
1. True recognition of each and every one of God’s people
2. A revelation of the inestimable worth of each member of the congregation
3. The utilization of this worth toward the building of real community
4. The functioning of every person in the Church according to his God-ordained purpose within his destined ministerial calling
5. The maturing of the Church into an organic ministering fellowship (the body of Messiah) with any number of horizontal relationships between members, yet only one direct vertical relationship—that between each member and the Lord Jesus [3]
         © 2016 by RJ Dawson. All Rights Reserved.

[1] Qahal is the Hebrew equivalent for “Church,” and is the word most likely used by Jesus.
[2] The word “Laity” originates from the New Testament Greek word laos (lah-’os). It is defined as a people group, whether socio-political, socio-religious, or cultural-ethnic. It generally refers to the “common people,” as a crowd, a populace, or a nation. It is also used as the people of God. When used in the latter sense, it means all of the people collectively. It is easy to see how the meaning of this word was corrupted when class division entered Christianity.
[3] Real Christianity—The Nature of the Church © 2001 by RJ Dawson. All Rights Reserved.

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

The Prophet

"Head of a Prophet" by Mikhail Vrubel


Real Christianity:  The Nature of the Church
By R.J. Dawson

Pages 95-97:  "For this reason also the wisdom of God said, 'I will send to them prophets and apostles, and some of them they will kill and some they will persecute, so that the blood of all the prophets, shed since the foundation of the world, may be charged against this generation, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who was killed between the altar and the house of God; yes, I tell you, it shall be charged against this generation.'  Woe to your lawyers!  For you have taken away the key of knowledge; you yourselves did not enter, and you hindered those who are entering."  (Luke 11:  49-52)

Keeping these cutting word of Jesus in mind, who do you suppose was the least popular guy of the Old Testament era?  This is not a reference to a particular individual but to a specific place of anointing.  Some of those with this anointing were very well-known, though not necessarily in a favorable sense.  The person who functioned in this gifting was very often treated unapprovingly due to his perceived lack of tact, his direct manner, and most notably, because he was always right.

Though accomplished, he could never rest on his laurels.  He was a guy who, as he grew stronger and more in tune with the Lord, was often looked upon by the locals with skepticism, derision, and outright contempt.  Another ratio of note concerned this person and whatever miscreant authority he was subject to.  Such authorities were, by and large, especially vicious toward this individual.  Though honest and without guile, he represented a threat to their power and position.  He refused to play politics.  He couldn't be bought.  But most of all, he couldn't be trusted to play by the rules unless the rules were authored by God himself.  He had to stand with God to the fullest extent or he would not stand at all, and he knew it.  He was the prophet.

All true prophets of God suffer severely from the slings and arrows of rejection, misunderstanding, and de facto excommunication from the collective heart of the community.  The prophet was revered and hated at the same time.  People had great respect and fear of his anointing but little respect or fear of his person.  Therefore, the prophet could usually receive the strength and will to go on only from God and possibly other prophets.  He was the perfect Old Testament iconoclast, exactly what God wanted him to be.

The Spirit of a Prophet
Josephus on John the Baptist
Wearing a Rough Garment